Most non-English speakers in the U.S. are turned away before their first cancer visit, new study finds
Rogel researchers found English speakers who call a hospital general information line were able to get information on next steps to access cancer care 94% of the time, compared to 38% for Spanish speakers, 28% for Mandarin speakers
ANN ARBOR, Michigan — New research reveals an alarming lack of access for non-English speakers who called hospitals across the United States looking for information on cancer care services.
Researchers from the University of Michigan Health Rogel Cancer Center set up a series of simulated patient calls to various hospital general information lines, speaking in English, Spanish and Mandarin. Nearly all the English-speaking callers were provided with next steps to access cancer care—such as a telephone number for presumed clinic or transfer to the department that was presumed to provide the requested care—while just over a third of the Spanish speakers had the same experience, and even fewer for Mandarin-speaking callers.
The study is published in the September 2023 issue of JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
“Our study found significant language-based disparities in patients’ access to cancer care well before they are seen by a physician,” said lead researcher Debbie W. Chen, M.D., clinical instructor of metabolism, endocrinology and diabetes at Michigan Medicine. “If patients with cancer cannot access information on where to obtain the appropriate cancer care, what other critical information and services are they not able to access in our health care system?”
Chen referenced a 2005 audit study in which simulated Spanish-speaking callers contacted the hospital general information line of New York City hospitals and requested the telephone number for one of the hospital’s out-patient clinics.
“Even though our study takes place 16 years later, during a time when more than 25 million individuals with limited English proficiency live in the United States, our study found even lower success rates for non-English-speaking persons seeking to access cancer care services. Most of the barriers that the simulated non-English-speaking callers encountered were systems-level issues, including being told ‘no,’ being hung up on by hospital staff, or being disconnected because the hospital’s automated message required input but did not provide language-concordant instructions, plus issues at the level of interpreter services,” she said.
The simulated calls were made to a random selection of 144 hospitals evenly distributed across 12 demographically diverse U.S. states, including California, Florida, New York, Texas, Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Michigan, Missouri, Oregon and Pennsylvania. The calls were made Monday through Friday between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. local time, from Nov. 8, 2021, and June 23, 2022. A total of 1,296 calls were completed; 432 in each language. Overall, 53% resulted in callers being provided with next steps to access cancer care. However, the Mandarin-speaking callers received that information only 28% of the time; Spanish-speakers were slightly higher at 38%, while English-speakers were connected to next steps 94% of the time. The researchers anticipate that patients who speak other, less commonly spoken, non-English languages may face even greater barriers to care.
The study authors proposed several potential interventions based on the different reasons for incomplete calls. They suggest that automatic messaging should be sure to include instructions for accessing the message in different languages and should default to a live person instead of disconnecting in instances where no input is made. They also recommend that general information personnel remain on the line when connecting callers to a language interpreter in order to help provide the sought-after information through the translator, who may not be able to answer questions about care on their own.
“The results of this important study highlight what we see every day on the ground level,” commented Darcie Green, executive director of the Latinas Contra Cancer, who was not involved in this research. “Spanish-speaking patients, as well as others who are not English-proficient, face preventable barriers in access to care starting at one of the most basic expectations we have when calling our health care provider—the ability to call in for an appointment or advice. This health inequity from the very start can lead to late detection, erosion of trust, disengagement from the health care system, and many other adverse health outcomes that serve to only deepen cancer care disparities.”
Green will be among the speakers at an upcoming NCCN Oncology Policy Summit taking place in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 12 on Measuring and Addressing Health-Related Social Needs in Cancer. She continued: “Additionally, as we lean into greater investment in community health workers and patient navigation to reduce disparities in detection, treatment and survivorship, it is crucial that the patients who need these services the most do not face unnecessary barriers to accessing them. This study should serve as an affirming but urgent call to action for accountability and to support and invest in the strategies and infrastructure needed to eliminate language-based health inequity in access to care.”
To read the entire study, visit JNCCN.org. Complimentary access to “Hidden Disparities: How Language Influences Patients’ Access to Cancer Care” is available until Dec. 10, 2023.
Courtesy of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network